Introduced on the occasion of Linux 5.15 a year ago, the latest NTFS driver, initially proprietary by Paragon Software, is no longer being edited by anyone, although some corrections were inserted several months ago in Paragon's Git but were not then submitted to the mainline. This has caused some discontent within the community, as this driver, unlike the previous one, has additional functionality and support for reading and writing.
Photo Credit: Pexels The well-known Linus Torvalds spoke on the matter recently in a thread opened by Kari Argillander concerning the topic, who contributed patches to the NTFS3 driver and also offered himself as a co-maintainer. Of course Linus would be easy if Kari took care of it, as would any other interested developer:
If you're willing to take care of it (and maybe find other like-minded people to help you), I think it would certainly be a thing to do. try. And if we can't find anyone who ends up taking care of its maintenance, then I believe we should remove it, rather than end up with two actually unmaintained copies of NTFS drivers. Not that two unmaintained filesystems are much worse than one :-p
Photo Credit: Unsplash The focus on the NTFS3 driver, however, has also led to a re-emergence of interest in the previous NTFS driver for Linux. In particular, developer Namjae Jeon, as reported by Phoronix colleagues, said: "I am currently working on writing support on NTFS (fs / ntfs) with the aim of being released in a few months. And after that, I'm going to start working on fsck in ntfsprogs in ntfs-3g to solve the current problem of the lack of utilities ".
Photo Credit: Pexels The well-known Linus Torvalds spoke on the matter recently in a thread opened by Kari Argillander concerning the topic, who contributed patches to the NTFS3 driver and also offered himself as a co-maintainer. Of course Linus would be easy if Kari took care of it, as would any other interested developer:
If you're willing to take care of it (and maybe find other like-minded people to help you), I think it would certainly be a thing to do. try. And if we can't find anyone who ends up taking care of its maintenance, then I believe we should remove it, rather than end up with two actually unmaintained copies of NTFS drivers. Not that two unmaintained filesystems are much worse than one :-p
Photo Credit: Unsplash The focus on the NTFS3 driver, however, has also led to a re-emergence of interest in the previous NTFS driver for Linux. In particular, developer Namjae Jeon, as reported by Phoronix colleagues, said: "I am currently working on writing support on NTFS (fs / ntfs) with the aim of being released in a few months. And after that, I'm going to start working on fsck in ntfsprogs in ntfs-3g to solve the current problem of the lack of utilities ".